Stability is a system, not a metric: lessons from scaling mobile test automation thumbnail

Stability is a system, not a metric: lessons from scaling mobile test automation

Many teams assume more automation leads to better quality, but at scale, this often breaks, resulting in flakiness, instability, and a loss of trust in test results.

In this talk, I’ll share lessons from scaling a large mobile automation ecosystem (~2000 Appium tests) where stability hovered around 40–50% and became a bottleneck for release confidence. The turning point wasn’t improving individual tests, but recognising stability as a system problem.

By rethinking test purpose, reducing unnecessary complexity, and improving failure handling, we shifted focus from fixing tests to fixing the surrounding system, which helped move stability toward ~90%.

This session explores the practical decisions, trade-offs, and lessons behind that shift, and how it changes the way teams approach automation, ownership, and quality at scale.

What you’ll learn:
  • Practical strategies for improving automation stability at scale
  • Lessons on balancing coverage vs reliability
  • Insights into modern quality engineering beyond “write more tests”
  • Reflections on how the QE role evolves when scaling complex systems

Comments

Sign in to comment
Explore MoT
From test cases to AI-ready quality data: why structure matters image
Learn how to structure and organize test management data as an AI-ready foundation that gives AI systems richer context for testing insights and workflows.
MoT Intermediate Certificate in Test Automation image
Elevate to senior test automation roles with mastery in automated checks, insightful reporting, and framework maintenance
This Week in Quality image
Debrief the week in Quality via a community radio show hosted by Simon Tomes and members of the community
Subscribe to our newsletter