Potential pitfalls of Quality Engineering
27 Mar 2026
In this moment:
Barry Ehigiator
In module 9 of the Software Quality Engineering Certificate, Barry Ehigiator writes about potential pitfalls in QE. Amongst others, he mentions:
- Poor implementation that leads to a lack of clarity on why they transitioned
- QE is seen as more of a process change than a cultural shift
- QE is seen as policing quality
I want to hear from the MoTaverse.
- Have you experienced a failed transition to Quality Engineering? What did you see, and what did you learn?
- Are you going through a transition? What have been the challenges? What have been the wins?
- Do you have any other insights into transitioning to, or working in a Quality Engineering environment? I'm particularly interested in experiences and stories.
For transparency, answers may be featured in an insight piece on this subject. Thank you for reading.
Ady Stokes
Freelance Consultant
He / Him
STEC and SQEC Certified. MoT Ambassador, writer, speaker, accessibility advocate. Consulting, Leeds Chapter Lead. MoT Certs curator. Testing wisdom, friendly, songs and poems. Great minds think differently
Sign in
to comment
Manage your entire QA lifecycle in one place. Sync Jira, automate scripts, and use AI to accelerate your testing.
Explore MoT
See where AI genuinely helps, where it doesn’t, and how testers can stay firmly in control
Boost your career in quality engineering with the MoT Software Quality Engineering Certificate.
Debrief the week in Quality via a community radio show hosted by Simon Tomes and members of the community
