Roundtable: AI did the work. Did anyone do the thinking?
Using AI isn’t the same as doing good work.
Five acceptance criteria, a pile of risks nobody discussed, and a story structure that mutates every time the model updates. AI is flooding refinement sessions with confident-sounding output, and somewhere along the way “I used AI” started passing as a substitute for “I did good work.” It isn’t.
Strip away the polish and what’s often missing is the thing that actually matters: human intent. Someone driving the thinking, not just prompting a tool and shipping the result.
This roundtable is for those who’ve stared at AI-generated tickets and felt the confusion set in, and for anyone building the reviewer skills, quality gates, and gut-checks to fight back. Bring your worst AI-generated-nonsense story, bring what’s actually worked, and bring an opinion on where the line sits between augmenting your thinking and outsourcing it entirely. Come ready to discuss.
Strip away the polish and what’s often missing is the thing that actually matters: human intent. Someone driving the thinking, not just prompting a tool and shipping the result.
This roundtable is for those who’ve stared at AI-generated tickets and felt the confusion set in, and for anyone building the reviewer skills, quality gates, and gut-checks to fight back. Bring your worst AI-generated-nonsense story, bring what’s actually worked, and bring an opinion on where the line sits between augmenting your thinking and outsourcing it entirely. Come ready to discuss.
