Two MoTacon attendees are on the left. The MoTaacon logo is in the center, and to the right a prompt to Get Your Ticket.

Daria Tsion | Comments

Displaying all 7 comments
Testing with feature flags: what we expected and what actually happened image
Thank Brandy, for sharing your experience. That's such a classic feature flag story šŸ˜„ They add a layer of complexity that’s easy to underestimate and manage sometimes. And from my experience, such "unrelated flag" bugs usually come from FF dependencies in the system, which is also another topic to discuss. Did you have any strategies for managing or testing flag combinations? Would love to hear!
Testing with feature flags: what we expected and what actually happened image
Thanks so much, Gary! šŸ™ Feature flags can feel a bit "extra" at first. Still, once you start using them intentionally (for safer releases and experiments), they really change how you think about delivery. Curious if you’re considering introducing them in your workflow anytime soon?
Five practical ways to use AI as a partner in Quality Engineering image
@Gary, thanks so much for your kind words and feedback! I'm glad you have found something useful in my milestone!
I'm an Ambassador now image
Congrats! Well deserved!
Five practical ways to use AI as a partner in Quality Engineering image
Thank you, Pranav! This is a great way to frame it. That shift from execution to orchestration is exactly what I’ve been observing in practice. The more AI takes over repetitive or mechanical tasks, the more QA value moves into problem framing, defining constraints, and sense-making of the output. For me, prompting became less about ā€œgetting code fasterā€ and more about making my own thinking explicit, especially around risks and assumptions. I’m glad that part came through in the article.
Five practical ways to use AI as a partner in Quality Engineering image
On keeping the prompt library separate: we discussed the same concern internally. We treated prompts as shared QA knowledge rather than implementation-specific assets, so a central repo made reuse and evolution across projects easier. For highly project-specific prompts, keeping them close to the test or codebase absolutely makes sense. In practice, we use a hybrid approach: central patterns + local adaptations. Consistency of structure mattered more than location. LMK please if you have any q!
Five practical ways to use AI as a partner in Quality Engineering image
Thanks, Nataliia, for a thoughtful comment. These are great questions. I'll respond to you in 2 separate comments^^ On role-based vs context-based prompting: I see them as complementary. Context defines what we are working with (system, feature, constraints), while the role shapes how the AI reasons about the problem. When I explicitly define a QA role, the output reflects testing heuristics, trade-offs, and structure much closer to real QA work. Context alone often isn’t enough for that depth.
Daria Tsion profile image
Daria Tsion
Head of QA
she/her

Head of QA with 11+ years of experience in building QA processes, leading teams, and driving test automation. Passionate about AI in QA, process optimization, and leadership in quality.

Open To
Work
Write
Teach
Speak
Mentor
Internship
CV Reviews
Podcasting
Meet at MoTaCon 2026
Review Conference Proposals
Subscribe to our newsletter