The Deadly Sins Of Acceptance Scenarios – Mark Winteringham thumbnail

The Deadly Sins Of Acceptance Scenarios – Mark Winteringham

BDD, ATDD, Acceptance criteria and scenarios are becoming an ever popular means of defining requirements, enabling collaboration, facilitating testing, development and checking activities. Yet when it comes to adopting these practises we misunderstand and misuse them to our team and to our product’s detriment and worse, as more teams make the move to use acceptance criteria and scenarios the common mistakes we make become accepted as the correct way to work.

The deadly sins of acceptance criteria and scenarios will challenge commonly held views made around creating and using acceptance criteria and scenarios, question their validity and explain why they are causing more harm than good, as well as how we might atone by changing our and our teams behaviour.

So if you sit alone writing scenarios as a means to create test scripts, or attempt to cover every boundary of a form field in one scenario, think that all acceptance scenarios should be automated to inform us we are delivering what the business wants then maybe you should find out if you are committing a deadly sin!


Comments

Sign in to comment
Explore MoT
Influence, from the other side of the table image
What I learned about influence by becoming a stakeholder
MoT Advanced Certificate in Test Automation image
Ascend to leadership roles by mastering strategic skills in automation strategy creation, planning and execution
This Week in Quality image
Debrief the week in Quality via a community radio show hosted by Simon Tomes and members of the community
Subscribe to our newsletter