Roundtable: AI Learnings and Demos thumbnail

Roundtable: AI Learnings and Demos

10 Jul 2026
  • Locked

In this AI sharing, learning and demo session we work through where AI has been earning its place in a testing workflow. Nataliia described her push to keep AI activity embedded in the same repository as the code it supports, and walked through an in-progress multi-agent workflow for backfilling test coverage on a high-risk access control project, plus a PR risk-flagging experiment that caught a regression the team had previously caught too late. Her stated preference throughout was for AI as an analysis and pattern-spotting tool rather than a generator of test cases, which she sees as a job better suited to humans on her team right now.

The conversation's throughline, raised by Stephen early on, was the unresolved question of how anyone actually knows whether an AI agent is doing a good job without predefined success criteria. That surfaced repeatedly: the gap between a well-structured test case and a useful one, the risk of AI-generated volume overwhelming the human reviewer, a proposed experiment to test agents against deliberately planted defects, and a closing analogy comparing AI hype to the supplement industry (real benefits exist, but unproven without personal measurement).Ā 

Jonathan Cole also joined in as they also worked through practical ground, like what actually distinguishes an "agent" from a custom prompt or Claude Chat project, and closed on the idea that AI is best used for things there simply isn't time to do otherwise, such as background exploratory testing or baseline security checks, rather than replacing work that's already going fine.

Session Chapters:

  1. 0:00 Welcome and session framingĀ 
  2. 5:30 Bringing AI output into the daily workflow
  3. 12:00 A three agent workflow for backfilling testsĀ 
  4. 19:00 Catching regressions with PR risk flaggingĀ 
  5. 24:00 How do you know it's doing a good job
  6. 31:00 Business value, KPIs and a planted defect testĀ 
  7. 39:00 Requirements, doom loops and model comparisonsĀ 
  8. 46:00 Taming AI's output volumeĀ 
  9. 53:00 Defining agents and where to prioritize real use cases

Ā 


Comments

Mr Stephen P Platten
Really interesting discussion and learnt a lot from Natalia.

Sign in to comment
Explore MoT
QA Leadership Summit - The AI-Native Edge: Leading the Future of QA image
QALS Summer 2026: a leadership summit to move beyond AI testing pilots and build production-ready, AI-first QA organizations - powered by the BrowserStack AI Test Platform and 25+ connected AI agents
Prompting for Testers image
Unleash the power of generative AI to boost your software testing and day-to-day tech tasks
This Week in Quality image
Debrief the week in Quality via a community radio show hosted by Simon Tomes and members of the community
Subscribe to our newsletter