Demi Van Malcot | Comments

As someone who is still hesitant about APIs (they are weird creatures I still don't fully comprehend 🙃) this sounds frightening and intriguing at the same time

For Dark and Aggressive I would put more then just Malevolant. For example glass half empty or doomsday thinking also counts as dark, but isn't really malevolant. Also is Empirical included in Scientific mindset? And intuitive in Exploratory?

I agree with Gary and Brandy, the first one immediately grabbed my attention and made me think it would be an interesting book.

What is for you the most difficult thing about doing quality assistance?

I am a fan of the snack-based incetive structure! 🍪🍫🍎🍌

What is the biggest change to your definition of QA that you dive into epistemology has caused?

When I'm joinign a podcast, I soemtimes forget I'm not visible and am gesturing while explaining things. What do you think are the pro's and con's of podcast being an audio-only medium?

How do you deal with the fact that in some crowds (see Quality engineers) your presence is celebrated, while in other crowds they loathe/dread when you are even mentioned?

How did you figure out what kind of leader you wanted to be, what was the turning point?

Very interesting article! In the projects I currently work on, data is one of the most important quality aspects. With constantly changing business requirements and changes to processes and code, it's very difficult to keep good quality of data in the test environment. I regularly have to check if the data we work with and base ourselves on is good data. I'm going to look into the bronze, silver and gold stages some more!

Approval criteria unclear. Please provide approval criteria for 'Quality Comments' that are clear, understandable, measurable and testable. 😉