Gary Hawkes | Comments
Getting tests that catch real failures is the hard part. Watch the recording now on demand!
Thanks everyone, really appreciate your support and being a part of this journey 🙏
This maybe 2022, but I found this really useful for today. Our team is getting smaller, we need to work differently and get more testing done earlier and from developers. Thanks Clare 🙏
Very useful talk as we will be in the coming months I think starting to be testing AI enabled chat features in our products. Thanks for doing it!
Is there any chance you can share the presentation as I can't see the slides on the video. Obviously, happy if you'd want remove the martial arts slides 😁
Thanks so much for this call for insights. I had a skim read of the capabilities model and then compared it to our AI policy document that was written in 2024 and there is a massive gulf. So this is on my list to fix as a result of watch this brilliant discussion. 🙏
Thanks for sharing this Megan. I don't often spend time reading around performance testing as I've often viewed it as a speciality. e.g. "We don't have a performance tester on our team" distorts my perception.
So this is the first article I've read that has explained this needs to change. It sounds like a great talk.
Good question Pedro! Well in our interview process, we have a 2 stage interview process. The first interview is a no pressure chat to find out about them as a person, how they like to work, what they enjoy and what they don't enjoy. Giving them the freedom to ask questions of us in the same style.
That interview to be honest is the most powerful as I can imagine how they would fit in the team, who they'd work well with and where they could make their biggest positive impact to us and to themselves.
The 2nd interview is about skills and the role they need to fill. If we need to evaluate their skills, no timed or live tests, we give them an exercise to do in their own time and access to the team to ask questions. They don't have to complete it, but be able to talk about their experience.
The first interview and their style of questioning of the team really gives an insight into their character. Hope that helps 🙏
Thank you all for taking the time to read it and Ady for being such a diligent editor 🙏
This is a brilliant comprehensive article! I've saved this in one of my collections as its one I'm going to return to. All of your test strategies are perfect building blocks for those who are about to begin testing products with LLM capabilities. We at the beginning of this and this article will be the start. Thank you so much for writing this! 🙏
Great conversation, thank you! I like the realisation of where to take advantage of peoples skills across the team. I admit, the dedicated automators I've worked with were better coders than testers. I've only worked with 1 quality engineer who could move between automation and exploratory testing with equal proficiency. So getting developers more involved in the automation, coaching from quality engineers and making sure we're using the right skills for the right levels of testing.
Very enjoyable chat, thanks for this. We work in peaks and troughs, and in the troughs I do a lot of learning but not necessarily thinking of my vision of the team.
Thank you Callum. Very powerful and very important 🙏
Gary Hawkes
Head of Engineering
He/Him
Head of Engineering who came from QE. Admirer of all humans (with a special affinity for testers). I love to bring out the best in people and help them grow. I have a very tactical view of delivery and love working to find the sweet spot so that processes are a balance between effort and value. Music nut.
Open To
Write
Mentor
Podcasting
CV Reviews