Ady Stokes | Comments
See how Lynqa runs your existing tests as written, captures step-by-step evidence, without code or no-code.
If quality professionals are there to help navigate beliefs in search of the truth. How do they build a shared understanding if stakeholders hold conflicting beliefs to the truth found?
Through similar research into thinking in testing, I believe the quality of software is intrinsically linked to the quality of thinking that goes into software development. So. How does the quality of thinking shape what we perceive as truth?
A long time ago, well before AI, I was told to include a black sheet with keywords using a white font colour. A human reader can't see them, but any automated filtering using keywords would pass. Is this still a thing, and if not, is there a modern equivalent 'trick'?
Which snacks are now the most disappointing, due to shrinkflation, cost rise, ingredient degradation, etc?
Bug congrats
I've seen so many posts on speed over quality on places like LI, it saddens me too. I believe thinking skills will win out in the end, as you cannot craft quality context-appropriate prompts without thinking about how to do that.
Huge bug congrats Adam
As Donald would say, that's Quacktastic! Bug congrats
Loved the framing of clarity of thought being linked to having solid fundamental testing knowledge. Great conversation
Ady Stokes
Freelance Consultant
He / Him
MoT Ambassador. Currently semi-retired and freelancing. I am, amongst other things, a writer, speaker, and accessibility advocate. Leeds Chapter Lead. MoT Certs curator and article editor for WonderProxy. Testing wisdom, friendly, testing songs and poems. Great minds think differently. STEC and SQEC Certified.
Open To
Teach
Speak
Podcasting
Meet at MoTaCon 2026
Review Conference Proposals
Write
